EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, someone will ask me: "Why do the Muslim extremist hate America so much?" Generally, my answer is something along the lines of ..."Well, they just don't like our way of life." And while at the core that is a true statement, it is also true that the whole answer is a bit more complicated than that.
To truly understand Muslim extremism, you have to go back to the death of the Prophet Muhammed. After living a long life of 61 years Muhammed died in 632 AD. His death was the catalyst for the creation of the extremism we see today. His death also marked the beginning of a century of battles and conquests that included parts of Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Northern Africa, parts of Asia, Afghanistan, Iberia any a few other nations/territorys that the muslims viewed as weak and evil. This string of battles and conquests ended almost 100 years later with a stinging defeat near Tours, France.
These "conquests", which included the basic destruction of the Roman and Persian Empires, didn't come without a cost though. During the battles and the years that followed, different sects of the overall religion began to drift in different directions based on their individual interpetations of the Koran. Some became more peaceful and others became more militant, hateful, and violent. Any nation or society that didn't follow the views and ways of the extremists were considered infidels and not worthy of continued existence.
Fast forward to the early to mid 20th century.....After a minor involvement in WWI & WWII and the creation of the nation of Israel, the Muslim extremist had found their new enemy. The nation of Israel and any country who supported her was going to be in for a rough time when dealing with Islam. This is where the United States really began to draw the attention of the extremists. Our support for Israel though is but only one of several reasons for their utter contempt for America. They consider us an evil immoral society with a way of life that totally goes against everything in their extreme interpretation of the Koran. But even more than that, they consider us a weak people and thus an excellent target for domination by extreme Islam. This image of weakness, while totally untrue, has been perpetuated by more than one U.S. administration thus encouraging even more attacks by these religious terrorists.
A couple of years ago, Ann Coulter wrote an excellent piece that illustrates precisely huge mistakes made by former admistrations that have led us to the place we are today in the war on terror.
How 9/11 Happened By Ann Coulter
We don't need a "commission" to find out how 9-11 happened. The truth is in the timeline:
PRESIDENT CARTER, DEMOCRAT.....In 1979, President Jimmy Carter allowed the Shah of Iran to be deposed by a mob of Islamic fanatics. A few months later, Muslims stormed the U.S. Embassy in Iran and took American Embassy staff hostage.Carter retaliated by canceling Iranian visas. He eventually ordered a disastrous and humiliating rescue attempt, crashing helicopters in the desert.
PRESIDENT REAGAN, REPUBLICAN ....The day of Reagan's inauguration, the hostages were released. In 1982, the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was bombed by Muslim extremists. President Reagan sent U.S. Marines to Beirut. In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut were blown up by Muslim extremists. Reagan said the U.S. would not surrender, but Democrats threw a hissy fit, introducing a resolution demanding that our troops be withdrawn. Reagan caved in to Democrat caterwauling in an election year and withdrew our troops – bombing Syrian-controlled areas on the way out. Democrats complained about that, too. In 1985, an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, was seized and a 69-year-old American was shot and thrown overboard by Muslim extremists. Reagan ordered a heart-stopping mission to capture the hijackers after "the allies" promised them safe passage. In a daring operation, American fighter pilots captured the hijackers and turned them over to the Italians – who then released them to safe harbor in Iraq. On April 5, 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. servicemen was bombed by Muslim extremists from the Libyan Embassy in East Berlin, killing an American. Ten days later, Reagan bombed Libya, despite our dear ally France refusing the use of their airspace. Americans bombed Gadhafi's residence, killing his daughter, and dropped a bomb on the French Embassy "by mistake." Reagan also stoked a long, bloody war between heinous regimes in Iran and Iraq. All this was while winning a final victory over Soviet totalitarianism.
PRESIDENT BUSH I, MODERATE REPUBLICAN ....In December 1988, a passenger jet, Pan Am Flight 103, was bombed over Lockerbie, Scotland, by Muslim extremists. President-elect George Bush claimed he would continue Reagan's policy of retaliating against terrorism, but did not. Without Reagan to gin her up, even Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher went wobbly, saying there would be no revenge for the bombing. In 1990, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. In early 1991, Bush went to war with Iraq. A majority of Democrats opposed the war, and later complained that Bush didn't "finish off the job" with Saddam.
PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, DEMOCRAT .....In February 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by Muslim fanatics, killing five people and injuring hundreds. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. In October 1993, 18 American troops were killed in a savage firefight in Somalia. The body of one American was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu as the Somalian hordes cheered. Clinton responded by calling off the hunt for Mohammed Farrah Aidid and ordering our troops home. Osama bin Laden later told ABC News: "The youth ... realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat." In November 1995, five Americans were killed and 30 wounded by a car bomb in Saudi Arabia set by Muslim extremists. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. In June 1996, a U.S. Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia was bombed by Muslim extremists. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. Months later, Saddam attacked the Kurdish-controlled city of Erbil. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, lobbed some bombs into Iraq hundreds of miles from Saddam's forces. In November 1997, Iraq refused to allow U.N. weapons inspections to do their jobs and threatened to shoot down a U.S. U-2 spy plane. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. In February 1998, Clinton threatened to bomb Iraq, but called it off when the United Nations said no. On Aug. 7, 1998, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by Muslim extremists. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. On Aug. 20, Monica Lewinsky appeared for the second time to testify before the grand jury. Clinton responded by bombing Afghanistan and Sudan, severely damaging a camel and an aspirin factory. On Dec. 16, the House of Representatives prepared to impeach Clinton the next day. Clinton retaliated by ordering major air strikes against Iraq, described by the New York Times as "by far the largest military action in Iraq since the end of the Gulf War in 1991." The only time Clinton decided to go to war with anyone in the vicinity of Muslim fanatics was in 1999 – when Clinton attacked Serbians who were fighting Islamic fanatics. In October 2000, our warship, the USS Cole, was attacked by Muslim extremists. Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing.
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, REPUBLICAN ....Bush came into office telling his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, he was "tired of swatting flies" – he wanted to eliminate al-Qaida. On Sept. 11, 2001, when Bush had been in office for barely seven months, 3,000 Americans were murdered in a savage terrorist attack on U.S. soil by Muslim extremists. Since then, Bush has won two wars against countries that harbored Muslim fanatics, captured Saddam Hussein, immobilized Osama bin Laden, destroyed al-Qaida's base, and begun to create the only functioning democracy in the Middle East other than Israel. Democrats opposed it all – except their phony support for war with Afghanistan, which they immediately complained about and said would be a Vietnam quagmire. And now they claim to be outraged that in the months before 9-11, Bush did not do everything Democrats opposed doing after 9-11.......What a surprise.
While Coulter tends to be a bit over the top on some issues, this column is a clear demonstration as to why Islamic extremists see us as weak and evil. Bottom line, We have the terrorists attention now. They won't stop until they destroy us OR we destroy them. Personally, I choose the latter. The United States has spent way too much time being politically correct (IE WEAK). We need to pound these people relentlessly. We need to be more aggressive in our pursuit of them. We need to fight these guys with the same unity and determination that we fought WWII with. Defeat is not an option for America and her allies in this War on Terror. But after the last 20 years of politcally correct non decisive action on Muslim issues and more than one missed opportunity to deal with terrorist leadership, it's time for the United States to take well planned, well supplied, and well executed decisive action against these terrorist without the constant interference of the socialist liberal element in America, at the UN, and around the world. Then and only then will we be able to put an end to questions like "Why Us?"
How do you think the U.S. has dealt with Muslim extremists? (closed poll)
- Too Harsh 0
- Not Harsh Enough 12
- Just Right 0
9 comments:
NOT FREAKIN HARSH ENOUGH
Monday July 24, 2006 - 12:23am (CDT)
Thanks for the information! Very good, and appriciated too.
I am in support of some of what Bush is doing.
Thanks again!
Monday July 24, 2006 - 12:51am (CDT)
Ya know, Mark...I've always said that 9-11 happened because we let it happen. No one ever did a damn thing in retaliation against any terrorist strikes against US interests over the years. Each time, they got more bold. The 1st WTC attack was a "failure" in their eyes - not enough blood shed. They went back and rehashed their plan, and killed 3000 people in the process. It took 3000 dead for people to open their eyes(albeit, briefly). Just ONE life lost should have been enough for people to realize that radical Islamists are the enemy to the free world.
All of that appeasement has led us to where we are today. We would've been FOOLS to let them get away with 9-11. If the Bush Administration didn't step up to the plate, you can be sure that there would've been plenty more terrorist attacks on US soil in the last 5 years.
Monday July 24, 2006 - 08:36am (EDT)
GOOD BLOG AND I ANSWERED THE QUESTION JUST LIKE THE OTHERS DID.
Monday July 24, 2006 - 07:48am (CDT)
When dealing with the bad guys, how many times have we heard the words, "a measured response"? In other words, how can we appear to be tough without being too tough? Ah the notion of being civilized!
It may all stem from the Marquess of Queensberry rules that were published in 1867. Rules of engagement for boxing were replaced by the rules of engagement for warfare. That only is applicable if all the fighters have subscribed to the same rulebook!
How about one of the biggies? There is the one where an opponent cannot be hit while he is down or against the ropes. Does that sound at all like how we handle our enemies?
I think our problem goes back to our earliest times when we decided that we would kick our opponents butts, however, we would always stop short of wiping them off the map. The likely most obvious one in recent memory was when Truman told MacArthur to stop at the Yalu River during the Korean War.
I mean look at World War II, we decisely whipped the Axis powers, culminated and punctuated by Nagasaki and Hiroshima. That should tell us something, a well placed nuke seems to me to be an appropriate approach. Remember the phrase? "Nuke 'em all and let God sort them out!"
The only thing that the Muslim extremists will ever understand is that the punishment always will more than exceed the crime. Our war against those that would totally destroy us must be about our demonstrating the same level of ruthlessness they seem to be able to muster.
We both must subscribe to the same rules, if one of the parties is committed to total annihilation and the Muslim extremists have; that means that to even adequately combat their threat we must have the same objective.
The Quaran is quite specific, it states that ALL apostates must be put to death. Anyone that is not a muslim is considered to be an apostate.
When it is obvious that someone will not stop until they kill you, how can anyone possibly imagine that words can win? Well over and over again the liberals and moderates make us into sissies by attempting their managing of a war of words!
Where is Barry Goldwater just when we need him the most?
As far as the treatment, though I do think President Bush is doing more to fight terrorism, he is still constrained by the public beleif that Muslims hate us because we deserve it. That beleif sickens me when I hear it. Did Jerusalem or Constantinople deserve it? Through out history extremist Muslims have rallied agains anything that was or is Christian. Is it because they really hate us, or is it because hate is one way to power. Hitler hated the jews and stired up that hate as much as he could during his reign. Was their any rational behind it that was really concrete, not to my knowledge. The problem is the masses of Muslims really only do what their fanatical leaders do, most come from countries where free speech is a rarity and access to world evenets is almost nil so they only know what they are told. They are told we are evil, and they beleive it. Many historians on religion call Muslim, Faith by the Sword, and for good reason.
Monday July 24, 2006 - 08:17am (PDT)
Bottom line, they hate us because of who we are; the top dog, numero uno; because of who we ally ourselves with- Israel. Because they are descendents of the bastard child and they know it.
Monday July 24, 2006 - 10:25am (CDT)
This post reaffirmed my belief in Conservatism and having Bush in office is the right choice. I can't imagine how many more terrorist attacks we would of suffered if Gore ended up as president. EEEWWW!
These terrorists of which I call subhuman or nonhuman are to be eradicated not appeased nor have a conversation with...they are to die. I would suggest a few more things but that would be politically incorrect. HAHA!
Monday July 24, 2006 - 06:27pm (EDT)
Definitely not harsh enough......obviously we conserv's all think the same. Wasn't 9-11 enough for us to wake up and realize what and who we are facing. Obviously not, because I still feel like we bend over backwards trying not to offend anyone! Too bad! Some feelings get hurt, oh well!! I want these terrorists gone and I think we should do whatever it takes to protect our present and future!
Monday July 24, 2006 - 08:06pm (PDT)
Post a Comment